System Affects Group Survey How the System Affects the Group Are you in charge of a system (which contains groups or units) or are you in charge of a single group? System Group So you are in charge of a system in which groups report to you Is your system functional? Is your system dysfunctional? So you are in charge of a group that is part of a system Is your group functional? Is your group dysfunctional? You are in charge of a functional system Is the group that reports to you functional? Is the group dysfunctional? You are in charge of a dysfunctional system Is the group that reports to you functional? Is the group dysfunctional? You are in charge of a functional group Is the system functional? Is the system dysfunctional? You are in charge of a dysfunctional group Is the system functional? Is the system dysfunctional? You are in charge of a functional system that has a functional group that reports to you Is the system's influence on this group high? Is the system's influence on this group low? You are in charge of a functional system that has a dysfunctional group that reports to you Is the system's influence on this group high? Is the system's influence on this group low? You are in charge of a dysfunctional system that has a dysfunctional group that reports to you Is the system's influence on this group high? Is the system's influence on this group low? You are in charge of a dysfunctional system that has a functional group that reports to you Is the system's influence on the group high? Is the system's influence on the group low? You are in charge of a functional group that reports to a functional system Is the system's influence on this group high? Is the system's influence on this group low? You are in charge of a functional group that reports to a dysfunctional system Is the system's influence on this group high? Is the system's influence on this group low? You are in charge of a dysfunctional group that reports to a functional system Is the system's influence on the group high? Is the system's influence on the group low? You are in charge of a dysfunctional group that reports to a dysfunctional system Is the system's influence on this group high? Is the system's influence on this group low? Variation 1: Functional Group in a Functional System with High Influence This is Camelot. Start moving the functional group towards being a healthy group. The more a functional system has influence, the more likely it is that the group will remain functional. In a functional system, if a group is functional, it is usually because the system is reinforcing the group's functional habits. If a functional group, inside an influential functional system, starts operating in dysfunctional ways, it is likely that the dysfunctionality will be temporary because the system's positive influence will pull it back into functional ways. If a functional group has tendencies towards becoming dysfunctional, yet the group does not become dysfunctional, usually it is because the positive system has high influence and doesn't allow the group to be dysfunctional. Vignette: Functional Group in a Functional System with High Influence Abe has been the satellite office manager for four years. Every quarter he fills out a written quality control report on the office activities for the previous three months. If there is a drop in performance, then in addition to the written quarterly report, a bi-weekly phone call with his regional manager is scheduled. During their phone call, Fran and Abe go over the possible reasons for the drop. If the drop is a surprise to both Abe and Fran, they switch to a monthly reporting system. Abe welcomes the process because he understands that Fran is there to assist him – without blame or shame. Variation 2: Functional Group in a Functional System with Low Influence When the functional system has low influence, whenever a functional group dips into dysfunctional behaviors, it will take longer for the group to become functional again. Encourage the system to have more contact and influence. This will move the group towards variation one. Vignette: Functional Group in a Functional System with Low Influence Ben was the first to open a branch office west of the Rocky Mountains. While he has turned a profit from the first anniversary on, he resents the fact that he didn't have any help from the home office to set up procedures. On his own, he has created a highly functioning office. Ben makes sure that employees are appreciated and have regular feedback on how their efforts satisfy the customers and positively affect the bottom line. Ben has been ambivalent about increasing the monitoring from the home office. On the one hand, he is probably doing things differently than what the home office does. He hasn't wanted them to actually change his style. On the other hand, if something were to go wrong (for example, Ben having an extended illness), it would be helpful to have the home office more involved. Now Ben has decided to increase the involvement of the home office. He arranges to have the VP fly out once a year. He also arranged for the company's national conference to be held in his city. This increased the home office's awareness and interest in Ben's operations. Variation 3: Functional Group in a Dysfunctional System with Low Influence The functional group inside a dysfunctional system is more likely to remain functional if the group is isolated from the system's influence. Do not increase contact with the system unless the system becomes functional. Note: When the system does become functional, if the system's influence is low then your group is variation two; if the newly-functional system has high influence then your group is variation one. Vignette: Functional Group in a Dysfunctional System with Low Influence Opening a new territory was a godsend for Cameron in that now he was much farther away from the dysfunctional home office. He had been given this opportunity because of his last district office success. While there, he had been reprimanded annually for having late reports and for ignoring the office's cryptic requests. Ignoring the guidelines in the company manual is exactly what had made him successful, and he knew he was too successful to be fired. Now with an office in a new territory, he has had valid excuses for not following the guidelines. Twice a year, he sends emails saying, "Still trying to understand the culture here. Will offer an alternative accounting system once I get settled in." He knows they cannot argue with him when he puts more money into the company's coffers than any other office. Variation 4: Dysfunctional Group in a Functional System with High Influence When a dysfunctional group climbs into functional behavior (variation one), it is likely to remain functional if it is part of a functional system that has high influence. Vignette: Dysfunctional Group in a Functional System with High Influence Dennis was a successful troubleshooter. When he inherited the motley crew at his current plant, he was challenged. Knowing that his propane company's commitment was to assist in any way possible, he waited for an opportunity for success. Fortuitously, the competitor in the same town decided to close their office. Dennis struck immediately. He brought in a cadre of the top salespeople. He matched each enthusiastic import with one of his laid-back-it-is-just-a-job employees. After two weeks of canvassing businesses and residents soliciting business, the imports' rubbing elbows with Dennis' staff worked. His employees caught the bug of enthusiasm and commitment. It can be argued that variations three and four are equally difficult. Being in charge of a functional group in a dysfunctional system with low influence (variation three) is challenging. Being in charge of a dysfunctional group in a functional system with high influence (variation four) can be equally challenging. Variation 5: Functional Group in a Dysfunctional System with High Influence The more functional group, inside an influential dysfunctional system, dips into operating dysfunctionally, the more likely it is that the group will stay there. Decrease the contact and influence with the system. Move the group towards variation three. Vignette: Functional Group in a Dysfunctional System with High Influence Although Elson and Dennis worked for different companies, their high school friendship bypassed competitive boundaries. They often talked on the phone. When Dennis phoned to share his recent success with Elson, there was a knowing silence, then they simultaneously broke into laughter. They both knew that Dennis' strategy wouldn't have worked for Elson's situation. Elson had a fine branch office except when the home office tried to interfere with what he was doing – which, unfortunately, was constant. The meddling was inane – busywork forms were required to be completed by Elson and his line chiefs. There was no relevance to the day-to-day operation of the plant. The paperwork dragon had to be slain. Finally, at the risk of being insubordinate, Elson decided to fight "details with details." He started asking for greater clarification from the home office on the trivial aspects of each form. This tied up the home office's left-brain approach. Elson also started making duplicate copies of weekly reports and just changing the dates. This minutia strategy freed Elson and his chiefs to concentrate more on the functioning of the group. Variation 6: Dysfunctional Group in a Functional System with Low Influence A dysfunctional group in a functional system with low influence on the group will tend to be isolated from the positive effects of the system and will therefore remain dysfunctional. Increase the system's contact and influence to increase the likelihood that the group will move towards variation four. Vignette: Dysfunctional Group in a Functional System with Low Influence Frank almost quit the company last year. He had two bullies in his department – the classic rotten apples that affected the whole barrel. The company was dysfunctional and wouldn't support his firing of the two emotional thugs. Frank didn't quit because he had heard that the corporation that bought out his company was very functional and actively supported middle managers. He wasn't disappointed when he met Samantha, his new straight-shooting supervisor. But Frank's area was not the only one that Samantha had to clean up. She didn't have the time Frank needed for her to get a clear view of Frank's two problem employees. Frank finally wrote her an email stating the current level and quality of productivity and what Frank's estimation of productivity could be with the two bullies removed. That caught her attention. She made Frank a deal, "Without you cuing me, if I can spot the two trouble makers myself then I will support you 100%. The next day Samantha spent time around Frank's department. She easily detected the two members who were emotionally lazy and bullied people to do their work for them. With Samantha's blessing, Frank delivered the bullies' walking papers the next day. Within a quarter, Frank's projections were realized. It can be argued that variations five and six are equally difficult. Being in charge of a functional group in a dysfunctional system with high influence (variation five) is challenging. Being in charge of a dysfunctional group in a functional system that has low influence (variation six) can be equally challenging. Variation 7: Dysfunctional Group in a Dysfunctional System with Low Influence A group that is dysfunctional in a dysfunctional system with low influence could become functional if the person-in-charge has enough leadership. Move towards variation three. Vignette: Dysfunctional Group in a Dysfunctional System with Low Influence Gerry had prudently observed both good and bad supervisors in his 30 years at various warehouses of the same company. He had convinced himself that he could do a good job if given a chance. When his supervisor walked off the job in disgust one day, Gerry skipped lunch and immediately marched into the headquarters to see Pete. "You have a lousy crew at the East side warehouse. I know that you don't have the luxury to properly train a new supervisor and none of the current supervisors at the other warehouses want to be reassigned to that warehouse.. Let me stick my neck out and take over the position at my current pay scale until I can prove that I have what it takes to lead." More than a little stunned, Pete, the head honcho, silently sized up Gerry. Finally Pete said, "I will give you three months." Gerry had anticipated that headquarters would not offer a realistic time line. He shot back with, "Nine months." And he calmly paused. Pete, moved by Gerry's gutsy proposal, slowly uttered "OK." Gerry turned to leave and then, in a "Columbo-like" manner, he turned around at the door and said, "Hey, do us both a favor – stay away for at least six months." Without another word or glance, Gerry left. Variation 8: Dysfunctional Group in a Dysfunctional System with High Influence If a group that is capable of being functional is instead dysfunctional, usually it is because the dysfunctional system doesn't allow/reward the group for being functional. If a group is dysfunctional, usually the system is dysfunctional and is reinforcing the group's dysfunctional habits. If a dysfunctional group, inside an influential dysfunctional system, starts operating in functional ways, it is likely that the functionality will be temporary because of the system's negative influence. The less influence a dysfunctional system has (variation seven), the more likely it is that a skilled person-in-charge will be able to convert a dysfunctional group into a functional group (variation six). Vignette: Dysfunctional Group in aDysfunctional System with High Influence When Harry took the position of managing an ineffective sales force, he pledged to try it for a year. At the job interview, he had negotiated for certain support but during the first six months, what he was promised either was not forthcoming or came with too many strings attached. Harry had tried several maneuvers to decrease the regional supervisors' visits to his office. The supervisors were relatives of the founders and didn't know how to be useful except to visit sites and take up managers' time. Harry especially resented it when he was expected to drop everything to go to lunch with these sycophants. At the end of the 11th month, he turned in his resignation. Harry was proud of his effort and even prouder of how clear he was that it wasn't he that was dysfunctional – it was the system. He himself was quite healthy. CAPTCHA Δ